Revenue Model & Analysis

East Energy + TGC Data Global Partnership

Data Center Competitive Landscape • Market Positioning • Strategic Differentiation

Market Position
Regional Leader
Southeast Focus

Data Center Market Competitive Landscape

The Southeast data center market is dominated by national REITs and hyperscalers, creating opportunity for regional providers with local expertise, competitive pricing, and specialized services. East Energy + TGC's partnership leverages power cost advantages and renewable energy positioning.

Major Data Center Competitors

CompanyTypeMarket Cap/ValueFacilitiesThreat Level
Digital Realty Trust (DLR)Global Data Center REIT$74B290+ global facilitiesHigh
Equinix (EQIX)Interconnection & Colocation Leader$75B240+ IBX centersHigh
QTS Realty (Acquired by Blackstone)Hyperscale Data CentersPrivate ($10B+ valuation)28+ data centersMedium
CyrusOne (Acquired by KKR/GIP)Enterprise & Hyperscale ColocationPrivate ($15B acquisition)50+ data centersMedium
Iron Mountain Data CentersEnterprise Colocation$14B (data centers ~25%)15+ data centersLow

Detailed Competitor Analysis

Digital Realty Trust (DLR)

High Threat
Type: Global Data Center REIT
Coverage: Global (47 metros)

Strengths

  • Scale & network effects
  • PlatformDIGITAL ecosystem
  • Strong hyperscaler relationships

Weaknesses

  • High pricing
  • Limited regional focus
  • Complex sales process

Equinix (EQIX)

High Threat
Type: Interconnection & Colocation Leader
Coverage: Global (70+ metros)

Strengths

  • Interconnection ecosystem
  • Premium locations
  • Enterprise focus

Weaknesses

  • Expensive pricing
  • Limited hyperscale capacity
  • Complex platform

QTS Realty (Acquired by Blackstone)

Medium Threat
Type: Hyperscale Data Centers
Coverage: US markets

Strengths

  • Hyperscale focus
  • Efficient operations
  • Strong margins

Weaknesses

  • Limited SME/enterprise
  • Geographic concentration
  • Acquired - strategy uncertain

CyrusOne (Acquired by KKR/GIP)

Medium Threat
Type: Enterprise & Hyperscale Colocation
Coverage: US & International

Strengths

  • Enterprise relationships
  • Hyperscale capabilities
  • Operational efficiency

Weaknesses

  • Private ownership changes
  • Limited Southeast presence
  • Integration risks

Southeast Regional Competitors

DataBank

High Threat
Locations: Charlotte, Raleigh, Atlanta
Focus: Regional enterprise colocation
Capacity: 8 Southeast facilities
Position: Regional enterprise provider

Flexential

Medium Threat
Locations: Charlotte, Atlanta
Focus: Hybrid IT solutions
Capacity: 40+ US facilities
Position: Hybrid cloud & colocation

EdgeConneX

Low Threat
Locations: Regional edge locations
Focus: Edge data centers
Capacity: 40+ edge facilities
Position: Edge computing specialist

Hyperscaler Competitive Dynamics

AWS

Current Regions:
us-east-1 (N. Virginia)
Proximity to NC:
~250 miles from NC sites
Strategy:
Owns infrastructure, rarely leases
Opportunity:
Disaster recovery, hybrid cloud
Partnership Potential:
Possible - AWS Outposts partner

Microsoft Azure

Current Regions:
East US (Virginia)
Proximity to NC:
~200 miles from NC sites
Strategy:
Expanding regional presence
Opportunity:
Edge computing, Azure Stack
Partnership Potential:
High potential - partner program

Google Cloud

Current Regions:
us-east4 (N. Virginia)
Proximity to NC:
~300 miles from NC sites
Strategy:
Selective regional expansion
Opportunity:
TGC existing partnership
Partnership Potential:
Existing relationship

🛡️ Competitive Moats & Defensibility Framework

⚠️ PE/VC Critical Question: "Why Can't Digital Realty Crush You?"

Institutional investors need to see sustainable competitive advantages beyond cost arbitrage. The following framework demonstrates structural barriers that prevent replication by larger competitors.

🔗 Network Effects & Customer Lock-in

MSP Service Integration Moat

Once customers adopt our 3-tier MSP model, switching costs become prohibitive:

  • • $500K-$2M integration costs to replicate custom configurations
  • • 12-18 month implementation timeline for enterprise tier services
  • • Proprietary monitoring APIs and data analytics platforms
  • • Cross-platform dependencies across colocation + managed services

Regional Ecosystem Network

Interconnected customer base creates network value:

  • • Agricultural technology integration (T1 Farmville ecosystem)
  • • Healthcare and government connectivity (T2 Wilson hub)
  • • Local peering and data exchange agreements
  • • Shared disaster recovery and backup services

⚖️ Regulatory & Legal Barriers

Utility Partnership Exclusivity

East Energy's utility relationships create barriers:

  • • 20-year exclusive renewable energy pricing agreements
  • • Priority interconnection rights at optimal grid nodes
  • • Grandfathered transmission capacity allocations
  • • Joint venture economics with East Energy parent company

Zoning & Development Rights

Site control advantages with regulatory approvals:

  • • Pre-approved zoning for high-power industrial use
  • • Environmental impact studies completed (2-3 year head start)
  • • Local government tax incentive agreements locked-in
  • • FAA clearance for tower construction (limited available sites)

🔬 Technology & Intellectual Property

TGC Proprietary Technology Stack

Leveraging TGC's proven hyperscaler technology:

  • • Proprietary cooling optimization algorithms (patent pending)
  • • Real-time power management and load balancing systems
  • • Automated facility management and predictive maintenance
  • • Custom hyperscaler integration APIs and orchestration tools

Renewable Energy Integration IP

East Energy's renewable integration technology:

  • • Smart grid integration and demand response algorithms
  • • Battery storage optimization for peak shaving
  • • Carbon tracking and ESG reporting automation
  • • Renewable energy certificate (REC) trading platform

💰 Capital & Scale Barriers

First-Mover Time Advantages

Market timing creates sustainable advantages:

  • • 24-36 month construction timeline advantage over new entrants
  • • Customer acquisition during competitor construction delays
  • • Talent acquisition in limited Southeast data center market
  • • Supply chain relationships and vendor exclusivity agreements

Economic Moats from Partnership Structure

Unique economics difficult to replicate:

  • • East Energy power cost advantages ($0.08 vs $0.12/kWh market)
  • • TGC operational expertise reduces development risk
  • • Combined entity credit rating improves debt financing terms
  • • Shared infrastructure reduces per-MW development costs

🎯 Competitive Response & Counter-Strategy Matrix

Competitive ThreatProbabilityTimelineOur Defensive ResponseMoat Strength
Digital Realty Southeast ExpansionMedium2-3 yearsCustomer lock-in via MSP integration, exclusive utility partnershipsStrong
Equinix Acquisition of Regional PlayerHigh12-18 monthsNetwork effects from interconnected customer base, regulatory barriersMedium
Hyperscaler Direct Investment (AWS/Azure)Medium3-5 yearsPartnership not competition, focus on hybrid/edge servicesStrong
New Utility-Backed Data CenterMedium2-4 yearsEast Energy exclusive agreements, first-mover customer relationshipsStrong
Technology Disruption (Edge Computing)High1-2 yearsT3 La Grange edge site positioning, SME technology adaptationMedium

🏰 Competitive Moat Validation Framework

🔗

Customer Switching Costs

$500K-$2M

Enterprise MSP migration cost

Power Cost Advantage

33%

Structural cost advantage

⏱️

First-Mover Advantage

24-36

Months ahead of competitors

🎯

Market Entry Barriers

$200M+

Capital required to compete

🛡️ Moat Durability Assessment

Strong Moats (5+ years)
  • • East Energy utility partnerships
  • • MSP customer integration lock-in
  • • Regulatory/zoning advantages
  • • TGC technology IP portfolio
Medium Moats (2-3 years)
  • • First-mover customer relationships
  • • Regional network effects
  • • Supply chain advantages
  • • Talent acquisition lead
Vulnerable Areas
  • • Technology disruption (edge)
  • • Hyperscaler direct competition
  • • Acquisition by larger players
  • • Power cost arbitrage erosion

🤝 Hyperscaler Partnership Reality Check

🚨 PE/VC Skepticism: "Why Won't AWS Just Build Their Own?"

Institutional investors consistently question hyperscaler partnership assumptions. The following analysis demonstrates why hyperscalers prefer strategic partnerships for regional/edge infrastructure over direct ownership.

🔗 TGC's Proven Hyperscaler Track Record

G

Google Cloud Partnership

Existing Strategic Alliance

Contract Value: $45M over 3 years (2022-2025)
Services: Hybrid cloud infrastructure, edge computing
Scope: 12 facilities across 8 markets
Performance: 99.97% uptime, 15% cost reduction vs direct GCP
Renewal Status: Extension negotiations ongoing for 2025-2030

Validation: Google's continued partnership demonstrates hyperscaler preference for third-party infrastructure in secondary markets.

M

Microsoft Azure Stack

Partner Program Tier 1

Partnership Level: Azure Stack HCI Premier Partner
Certification: Azure Arc-enabled infrastructure
Pipeline Value: $28M identified opportunities
Focus Areas: Hybrid cloud, disaster recovery, edge computing
Support Level: Direct Microsoft engineering support

Opportunity: Microsoft's edge strategy requires regional partners for Azure Stack deployment in secondary markets.

A

AWS Outposts Pipeline

Partner Development Track

Status: AWS Partner Network (APN) Advanced Tier
Outposts Capability: Deployment and management certified
Target Opportunities: $35M over 24 months
Focus Sectors: Financial services, healthcare compliance
AWS Support: Dedicated solutions architect assigned

Strategic Value: AWS Outposts require local infrastructure partners for enterprise hybrid cloud deployments.

💰 Economic Logic: Why Hyperscalers Prefer Partnerships

❌ Hyperscaler Direct Build Challenges

Capital Intensity vs ROI

$200M+ investment for 43MW capacity in secondary markets with uncertain demand

Regulatory & Permitting Risk

24-36 month timeline for environmental studies, zoning approvals, utility interconnection

Local Market Knowledge Gap

Limited understanding of Southeast enterprise customer relationships and requirements

Operational Complexity

Managing 50+ small regional facilities vs 10-15 hyperscale campuses

✅ Partnership Model Advantages

Asset-Light Expansion

Rapid market entry with zero CapEx, revenue sharing vs full ownership risk

Risk Transfer

Partner assumes development, regulatory, and operational risks while hyperscaler captures revenue

Local Expertise Access

Immediate access to regional relationships, regulatory knowledge, and customer base

Core Focus Maintenance

Continue investing in innovation vs infrastructure management in secondary markets

📊 Partnership Economics & Revenue Sharing Models

Partnership ModelHyperscaler Revenue ShareTGC Revenue ShareInvestment RequiredRisk Profile
AWS Outposts Hosting65-70%30-35%$0 (AWS equipment)Low
Azure Stack HCI55-65%35-45%$2-5M (infrastructure)Medium
Google Cloud VMware Engine60-70%30-40%$3-8M (VMware licensing)Medium
Hybrid Cloud Services (All)40-50%50-60%$10-15M (custom build)Low
$155M
5-Year Partnership Pipeline
Projected value across all hyperscalers
$35.6M
TGC Revenue Share
23% blended share across partnerships
$0-15M
Partnership Investment
vs $200M+ direct build cost

🚀 Partnership Development Pipeline

Google Cloud - Contract Extension
2025-2030 renewal negotiations ongoing
$75M
Projected value
Microsoft Azure Stack - Expansion
Southeast regional deployment program
$45M
24-month pipeline
AWS Outposts - New Partnership
Financial services focus initiative
$35M
Under negotiation

East Energy + TGC Partnership: Unmatched Competitive Advantages

About East Energy Renewables

East Energy Renewables is a proven biomass and waste-to-energy company with operational infrastructure at all three datacenter sites, bringing unprecedented cost advantages and operational synergies.

T1 Farmville

15MW biomass plant operational since 2019, processing 200 tons/day agricultural waste

T2 Wilson

25MW biomass plant operational Q4 2024, 280 tons/day capacity

T3 La Grange

25MW biomass plant operational Q4 2024, 280 tons/day capacity

🏆 INFRASTRUCTURE OWNERSHIP ADVANTAGES

Zero Land Acquisition Costs
East Energy owns all three sites with existing infrastructure
Competitor cost: $12-18M per site
Existing Power Generation
Operational biomass plants: 15MW + 25MW + 25MW capacity
Competitor cost: $25-35M per site
Water Rights & Infrastructure
Owned water rights and distribution systems
Competitor cost: $8-12M per site
Experienced Operations Team
East Energy Operations: decades of experience, 18-20 technicians per site
Competitor cost: $5-8M new team

💰 REVENUE DIVERSIFICATION MODEL

Datacenter Colocation
Primary revenue: $388M by Year 5
65-75% margins with cost advantages
Biomass Power Sales to Grid
Stable revenue: $15M annually from waste-to-energy
25-35% margins, net energy positive
Carbon Credits & RNG Development
Growing revenue: $2M → $8M by Year 5
70-80% margins, expanding program
Solar Leasing & Thermal Energy
Additional revenue: $5M annually
Co-located industrial customers

Traditional Datacenter

$73M
Infrastructure CAPEX per site
+ $3.2M annual energy costs

East Energy + TGC

$8M
Infrastructure integration cost
Net revenue from energy sales

Competitive Advantage

89%
CAPEX reduction per site
+60-80% ROI enhancement

🎯 COMPETITIVE POSITIONING VS MARKET

vs. National REITs (Digital Realty, Equinix)
  • • 89% lower infrastructure costs enable 40-50% price advantage
  • • Regional focus with existing renewable energy operations
  • • Multiple revenue streams vs single colocation dependency
  • • Net-positive energy costs vs $3.2M annual expense
vs. Regional Providers & Hyperscalers
  • • TGC's proven hyperscaler partnerships (Google, Microsoft)
  • • East Energy's operational expertise across renewable energy
  • • Unique waste-to-energy model creates sustainability advantage
  • • Partner model for hyperscalers vs direct competition

🛡️ Competitive Threats & Response Strategies

High Threat: Digital Realty & Equinix
  • Response: Focus on underserved enterprise segment
  • Strategy: Superior customer service + competitive pricing
  • Timing: Enter before they expand Southeast presence
Medium Threat: Regional Providers
  • Response: Scale advantages + hyperscaler partnerships
  • Strategy: Superior technology + operational efficiency
  • Differentiation: Renewable energy + TGC expertise
Partnership Opportunities
  • Hyperscalers: Edge computing, disaster recovery, hybrid cloud
  • Regional ISPs: Connectivity partnerships, edge deployment
  • Enterprise: Private cloud, compliance solutions