Back to Risk Management

Site Analysis

Infrastructure comparison and site evaluation

Site Infrastructure Analysis

Comprehensive comparison of datacenter site locations including power capacity, reliability metrics, and infrastructure capabilities across our three potential deployment sites.

Infrastructure Comparison Matrix

Infrastructure ComponentT1 FarmvilleT2 WilsonT3 La Grange
Phase 1 MW Capacity5 MW5 MW2.5MW
Phase 1 ReliabilityOKAveragePoor
Phase 2 MW Capacity10 MW*10 MW*5 MW
Phase 2 ReliabilityGoodGoodOK*
Phase 1 Natural Gas ServiceYesYesNo
Phase 2 Natural Gas ServiceYesYesPossible*
Diesel Gas Storage Required?TBDTBDTBD
Reclaim Water Capacity0.25 MGD*> 0.25 MGDNone
Reclaim Water ReliabilityOK*OK
Backup and Fire WaterOKOKPoor

Individual Site Profiles

T1 Farmville

Power Capacity

Phase 1: 5 MW

Phase 2: 10 MW*

Reliability

Phase 1: OK

Phase 2: Good

Natural Gas

Phase 1: Yes

Phase 2: Yes

Water Infrastructure

Reclaim: 0.25 MGD*

Backup/Fire: OK

T2 Wilson

Power Capacity

Phase 1: 5 MW

Phase 2: 10 MW*

Reliability

Phase 1: Average

Phase 2: Good

Natural Gas

Phase 1: Yes

Phase 2: Yes

Water Infrastructure

Reclaim: > 0.25 MGD

Backup/Fire: OK

T3 La Grange

Power Capacity

Phase 1: 2.5MW

Phase 2: 5 MW

Reliability

Phase 1: Poor

Phase 2: OK*

Natural Gas

Phase 1: No

Phase 2: Possible*

Water Infrastructure

Reclaim: None

Backup/Fire: Poor

Site Analysis Summary

Key Advantages by Site

T1 Farmville

Good Phase 2 reliability, natural gas availability, adequate water capacity

T2 Wilson

Highest water capacity, good overall reliability, best infrastructure balance

T3 La Grange

Lower capacity option for smaller deployments, cost-effective entry point

Critical Considerations

Diesel storage requirements need determination (TBD) for all sites

T3 La Grange has limited infrastructure capabilities

Phase 2 expansions marked with * require further validation

Natural gas service varies significantly by location